Overcoming the deafening silence

Justin Zhuang

— January 19th, 2009, 11.03pm

Overcoming the deafening silence

He may need aid to hear you clearly, but the leader of The Workers’ Party needs no help in speaking up--Photo: Sam Kang Li

For someone who is critical of the government for being deaf to its citizen’s opinions, especially in the past, the leader of Singapore’s largest opposition political party, The Workers’ Party (WP), is ironically half-deaf himself.

As Mr Low Thia Khiang puts on his hearing aids at the start of the interview, the 52-year-old said he lost 50 per cent of high frequency hearing in both ears probably from not wearing earplugs at the shooting range during his National Service when he served as an instructor.

The severity of the problem did not hit Mr Low until he realised he could not hear during Parliament. He was seeking clarification but then-Speaker Tan Soo Khoon told him to sit down and wait for the others to finish. “But I carried on, and he thought this guy was trying to be funny,” he said.

At first Mr Low wondered why the Speaker was so angry and it was only after the session that he realised what had gone wrong.

As if being hard of hearing is not bad enough, Mr Low has problems with his English too. At the last general election, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew had questioned if an apology letter written in English for Mr Low’s party candidate, Mr James Gomez, was really written by him.

While MM Lee was accurate in his observation – Mr Gomez had written the letter while Mr Low only edited it — the latter found it nothing to be ashamed of. He even told the press, “Of course, my English is not as good as MM Lee’s. But, his Chinese is definitely not better than mine.”

And Mr Low readily confesses that he got an F9 for English in both his A-Levels and O-Levels. As the last batch of students from the former Nanyang University (Nantah), he belongs to a dying community of Singaporeans educated in the Chinese medium at a time when the country was switching to English as its medium of instruction in schools.

Then Prime Minister Lee had made a speech at Nantah where he labelled it a third-class university as compared to Cambridge, Oxford and then University of Singapore (SU), Mr Low recalls. This was why in 1980, during Mr Low’s final examinations, it was announced that the National University of Singapore would form by merging Nantah with SU.

“They call it a merger, but to me it’s a closing down of Nantah,” he is quick to correct.

The young Mr Low was outraged with the decision, and so were many of the other students. Together with some friends, they put up protest posters around the Nantah campus, wrote letters to the press and even snagged an interview with a journalist from a Chinese paper.

“Amazingly, nothing came out… the whole public opinion was so one-sided,” he boomed. For the first time, Mr Low saw how public opinion in Singapore could be engineered to favour those in power, “I asked myself as a citizen of Singapore, if there is something which I feel that is unjust, something that is not right, probably people will not know because if press don’t report, who knows?”

The Final Straw

Mr Low grew up in a family of five and his sisters brought him up after their parents passed away when he was only in secondary school. As a student in Chung Cheng (Main) he almost got expelled for disciplinary problems.

Fortunately, his principal was merciful and Mr Low eventually enrolled in Nantah, majoring in both Chinese Language and Literature and Government and Political Administration.

It was his interest in the latter and the desire to read Western political thinkers like Plato and Max Weber that spurred Mr Low to brush up his English in university. But by the time he was to pursue honours in the newly opened NUS, he was still not confident enough in his English.

Thus, the political science department’s warning that theses would be marked down for poor English coupled with the discrimination he felt from the department towards the Chinese-educated pushed him to do his honours in Chinese Studies instead.

After graduation, he became a Chinese-language teacher at Pei Dao Secondary where he encountered the final straw that led him into politics. “To face a student everyday, knowing they are not slow learners but they will not make it because of the system, I can’t tell the student that,” he said.

Seeing his normal stream students demoralised by the system frustrated the young teacher. “Are they slow learners? Today, after so many years, I am proven right because many of them are very successful.” he said.

But Mr Low could not wait to be vindicated and quit teaching after only two years. By then, the contracting business he started while teaching had taken off and he was already a member of the WP led by the late Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam. One of the earliest things he did was to push the party to make streaming an issue in the 1984 elections.

Today, that education system that finally drove Mr Low to join the WP in 1982 has changed for the better. “Of course, the ruling government will never admit that this is from pressure from the ground, from the opposition… you can’t claim credit, but it’s ok, at least you can see some changes.”

And it is seeing his efforts improve the lives for Singaporeans that keeps him going after over 20 years in politics.

Apathy is not an Issue

While he has not thought of his retirement plans, party renewal is not far away from the party chief’s mind, “I will have to give up one day, will there be people who will move the party forward or that’s the end?”

Mr Low’s biggest concern is that the party still does not have enough people — quantity and quality — to form an alternative government today and he admits that to join opposition politics takes a certain breed of people who are willing to toil away.

But he is quick to rubbish the myth that it is dangerous to be associated with opposition politics, “Not true what, my life has never been difficult, whether in business or in life. People use it as an excuse.”

He recalls that he joined WP while still a teacher and his vice-principal used to keep newspaper cuttings of him and his colleagues speculated when he would be sacked. “To me, I deliver, I do my job… what is there reason for you to sack me?” he said.

The apathy of the youth towards politics does not worry the father of three either. He keeps an open mind on the issue as he thinks the youth have diverse interests and it may simply not be the right time for them to be interested anyway. For those who want to take up politics, his advice is to join a party with “eyes open”, understand the party and its objectives and be prepared for any possible outcome.

Now or Never

Mr Low himself had much to deliberate before he joined the WP. His children were young and many like him would have waited a little longer. Moreover, it was a time of uncertainty for opposition politicians as people were arrested under the Internal Security Act.

But for Mr Low, it was a case of now or never, and he candidly told his wife before joining the party, “One day I might have to go to jail.”

But he never did.

After losing his maiden elections in Tiong Bahru GRC in 1988, Low won the single-seat ward in Hougang in 1991 and has not looked back. In the last elections in 2006, he even won with his biggest margin ever.

A big factor of his success lies in Mr Low’s style of politics that has earned him praise even from the ruling People’s Action Party as the kind of opposition acceptable to them.

Perhaps, one of the three calligraphy piece that adorns his office wall best describes the Buddhist’s approach to politics. Inspired by the Chan Zong teaching, it loosely translates to read that no matter what happens in the surroundings, one should not be distracted and stay calm inside.

Such a Zen-like approach differs sharply from his predecessor, Jeyaretnam’s fiery-brand of politics. Mr Low is terse when speaking about the man whom he took over as WP’s Secretary-General in 2001 in less than amicable terms.

Mr Jeyaretnam had then accused the WP and Mr Low for not helping him out with his debts incurred from the defamation suits he had to face from the PAP leaders.

What Mr Jeyaretnam went through showed Mr Low the political traps that he had to avoid to survive. And as if to distance himself from the man, he adds, “Being a leader to me is about responsibility, when the party entangles, you demoralise everybody, you also discourage people who may be interested.”

For critics who say the WP is not aggressive enough and too similar to the PAP, he assures them that the party is confident of its approach and why they are doing it.

low-thia-kiang-phoneThe WP acts as a check on the government to make it accountable and provides Singaporeans with a choice to make sure the democracy here work, says Mr Low.

This is especially important when the government here often makes decisions with little consultation, and this was the biggest problem he saw when he entered politics.

“There is no compromise, even though people feel it is not in interest of the nation, but you can’t say anything, who is going to hear you? Not even the news. So best way is to get into politics, so that when I ask question in Parliament, you have to answer, and you better answer!” he said.

Since his days at Nantah, he remains sceptical of the local press and is selective to the journalists he speaks to. When Mr Low first got elected he told the press an important reason why he won was because he was never interviewed by them. He thinks that journalists need to have a sense of mission and has met only a few who dare to push the boundaries.

Mr Low sees himself as the voice of the voiceless and despite his plain, and at times broken English, one hears a man who wants to speak up against the injustices in the Singapore system. “I was born here, this is my country. If I think there is wrong, I will fight,” he said, thumping the table to bring the point home.

Editor’s note: In the earlier version of our article, we wrote that Mr Low, together with some friends, “put up protest posters around the island” in response to the merger between Nantah and SU. Mr Low did not put up posters around the island, but only within the Nantah Campus. We changed the sentence at 1247am, April 23, 2011.

To get more updates from our website, follow us on our Facebook and Twitter.


Disclaimer: Comments left on articles in The Enquirer are contributions from readers and do not reflect the views of the editorial team. The Enquirer is not responsible for the comments and reserves the right to remove any comments deemed inflammatory or in bad taste.

  1. Great article,it helps me know more about this political leader. Thanks and keep up the good work!

  2. eh, i think something wrong with your donation page. keeps putting me in UK ….

  3. Excellent article! Good to hear more about Mr. Low.

  4. [...] knew too much: Perez Hilton/Mario Lavandeira, blogger: the meaning of his success – The Enquirer: Overcoming the deafening silence – AngryAngMo: Singapores Real Zoo – MRTs Unexplored Species – Aussie Pete: Nudity Makes Top New [...]

  5. Interesting article. Much more interesting than the one Anshuman Das wrote.

    We want to donate to WP instead of I Gave.

  6. Well interviewed. Quite surprise Low TK willing to take interview as this is not his “style”. Hope WP Chairperson Sylvia Lim will be the next, as well as others opp leaders.

  7. [...] The Enquirer to read the full article.  Email this to a Friend Bookmark this sociallist_url = [...]

  8. smallvice585


    February 4th, 2009 at 12.16am

    How to keep check on PAP if you don’t have enough votes to counter PAP’s position on parliamentary voting?

  9. He is like the candle in the wind…but it does bring lots of hope to many in Singapore. Fight on!

  10. Mr Low is a true fighter and works tirelessly for his constituents. His work-rate and connection with his Hougang residents are legendary.

    He is the voice of reason and of conscience. More Singaporeans should wake up to the fact that the PAP has become complacent and taken their MP-ships and Mini-star Million dollar salaries for granted.

    We have Labour MPs blindly defending the jobs credit scheme when very legitimate and reasonable concerns are raised. Do they really help stem the tide of retrenchments given it is not labour cost competitiveness per se but slump in global demand that is the cause of the current economic recession.

    Hand-outs for businesses as NMP Siew Kum Hong described the jobs credit scheme is accurate. The PAP govt abhors handouts to citizens but gives us money prior to elections. Now when unemployed citizens need help most, we abhor welfare and chose to make profitable companies continue to be profitable.

    Not sure if PAP is truly working in the best interests of the people?

  11. He recalls that he joined WP while still a teacher and his vice-principal used to keep newspaper cuttings of him and his colleagues speculated when he would be sacked. “To me, I deliver, I do my job… what is there reason for you to sack me?” he said.

    Unfortunately, MOE’s current HR policy lists “Speaking disparagingly of the Government” as an offence that can get you sacked

  12. “How to keep check on PAP if you don’t have enough votes to counter PAP’s position on parliamentary voting?”

    You can’t. That is why the people needs to elect more oppositions. Better than staying away from parliament totally.

    “Speaking disparagingly of the Government” as an offence that can get you sacked”

    I hope the powers that be can tell the difference between “disparaging” and “criticizing” and “PAP” and “government”.

  13. bizzkit0102


    February 23rd, 2009 at 11.09pm

    Great job man guys for getting an interview with Mr Low, the great man himself.

    Yes we need to elect more opposition into parliament. Ok, while I feel most of us will never live to see a day that PAP will be toppled, I hope to live to see a day where parliament will not be a pointless political exercise merely eating into 15 mins of daily TV programming.

    I agree with Mr Low that really, PAP is not interested in listening to us when making their policies. Yeo Cheow Tong once said that foreigners envy our parliament coz some issues in their country take months to resolve while we only take days. Personally I feel its because in other countries, they actually have a meaningful debate instead of the hogwash seen in Sg’s parliament. So really we should vote more opposition in to actually have meaningful discussions.

    Unfortunately, there seems to be an opposition genocide happening in sg. And the most sad part is that till today, many singaporeans still vote for PAP not because they think they are good, but because of fear. Fear of what? God knows. Why is there this culture of fear in the first place? Its sad and pathetic.

    Of course, having said that, that doesn’t mean that all the present opposition are good. Still, one has to think through before he votes.

    Oh, and to LKY who was being a prick when he criticized Mr Low’s english. How do you teach your son? At least I’m sure Mr Low’s children will know that mee siam has no cockles in it!

    Lets hope sg can see more great men like Mr Low and Mr Chiam See Tong. Respect.

  14. bizzkit0102


    February 23rd, 2009 at 11.12pm

    To Anonymous:

    Yeah, I won’t be giving a cent to iGave but everytime I see WP members selling their newspaper in my market, I will buy a copy. Also want to help to fund their cause.

  15. [...] They had little to rely on, but NTU readers relied on them for more than they imagined. Within the Enquirer’s short active lifespan, our writers captivated NTU students with in-depth stories on a Ministerial Forum, the debate over the University’s name change, and interviews with politicians. [...]

  16. What a wonderful and insightful story, Justin. Enjoyed it tremendously :)

  17. Gilian


    May 19th, 2011 at 4.08am

    It is greatly heartening to know that a half deaf Opposition leader can listen better than a full cabinet of ministers:)

  18. Ryan Joseph


    May 19th, 2011 at 6.54am

    Just read this some 2 days after it was first published – thanks for recirculating it .. enjoyed it very much! :)

  19. Ryan Joseph


    May 19th, 2011 at 6.55am

    Opps I said 2 days, I mean two years!!

  20. Anderson


    May 19th, 2011 at 2.19pm

    Low Thia Khiang having broken English ? Seriously, Low put to shame those highly-educated ministers from prestigious western university in term of common sense, passion and spirit. In the end, his broken English make Low look even more distinctive and iconic in parliament. His voice and style of speaking give a sense of power and justice, and soon you forget that he is using broken English, but enchanted by his heart and determination to speak against injustice. Beside, having a Broken English give a sense that he is a commoner (of non-english educated generation) and that he is speaking for them.

    The ultimate greatness of a person lies in his heart, and that alone transcends all quality and liability of that person. Low Thia Khiang has proved this true, and so has many members of opp parties.