A collective stake in the university: i-gave president

Choudhury Anshuman Das

— December 18th, 2008, 1.26am

The sentiments expressed by Justin Zhuang’s (Everything I-gave was not enough?, October 23) are probably shared by a number of other students at NTU.

As the president of the 17th Students’ Union, and now president of the i-gave Class Gift 2009, I feel that I am able to share my perspectives on this issue from first-hand experience.

When we participate in the i-gave class giving program, we are investing in our shared future. This is because the value of our degree is indelibly tied to our alma mater’s standing.

Many of my fellow schoolmates—especially final-year students who face the prospect of entering the corporate world or pursuing further studies—are starting to reckon with this fact: the reputation of where we graduate from matters.  In fact some of the most common questions employers or graduate school deans will ask when we knock on their doors are: where we graduated from, how was our university experience, what is the standing of our alma mater, etc.

When we invest in i-gave, it is the participation that matters—not the amount. When corporate foundations and philanthropists see NTU students and alumni give passionately towards our alma mater, they too, will be drawn to our culture of giving.

While it is true that most students cannot afford to give large sums, every single donation—whatever the amount—makes a difference. When the contributions of the entire student population is pooled together with the giving from alumni, faculty, staff, corporations, foundations, and community philanthropists, the impact is multiplied.

Sometimes, our generation is accused of being the “me” generation. We preface everything we do with a question: what’s in it for me? But I believe that this is a cynical view. If we’ve only looked hard enough we would realise that for good or worse, NTU has been an important juncture of our life, and that NTU has provided a great deal to all of us without the skeptical view of “what’s in it for me”.

All of us have a collective stake in the university.

Choudhury Anshuman Das
President, i-gave Class Giving 2009
Final-year Chemical & Biomedical Engineering student

Comments

Disclaimer: Comments left on articles in The Enquirer are contributions from readers and do not reflect the views of the editorial team. The Enquirer is not responsible for the comments and reserves the right to remove any comments deemed inflammatory or in bad taste.

  1. [...] of the Singapore Spirit – Mathia Lee: AWARE’s Comprehensive Sex Ed Programme – The Enquirer: A collective stake in the university: i-gave president – Sg_Ljers: Where am I? (Uniquely [...]

  2. [...] Spirit [Recommended] – Mathia Lee: AWARE’s Comprehensive Sex Ed Programme – The Enquirer: A collective stake in the university: i-gave president – Sg_Ljers: Where am I? (Uniquely Singapore) – TOC: Mother Machine [Recommended] – WayangParty [...]

  3. Well i do agree on that “for good or worse, NTU has been an important juncture of our life”.

    Then again, there’s this mental image about what is NTU to an individual, which is different from one NTU student or staff to another.

    It depends invariably on how involved an individual is in the NTU community, and the establishing (or the lack of) sense of attachment and commitment follows.

    To a highly-involved student, it could be that hassles encountered at adminstration levels in obtaining the go-ahead to proceed in activities-planning and the like, be reason that irks the notion of donating back to a entity of hassles.

    To a not-so-involved student, it could be how departments/faculties/other modes of influence on campus seemingly appear not as a wholesome entity of a varsity , but as fragmented pieces of a blurry administration body, that backfires the i-gave program.

    I’m not excluding the happier encounters. I am happy with the range of professors i have to spice my academic pursuit. I am happy with the landscape of the campus. I am not so happy with the bus services and the canteen food though.. We all have our concerns.

    But i’m not sure who i should smile at and say thanks for the wonderful upkeeping of the greens around campus when i walk past the empty field; i’m not sure who to give my thanks to for the efforts in providing wonderful academia when i walk past the icy glass doors of the staff office.

    Probably, what needs to be worked on here, is to have the various departments/faculties/other modes of influence on campus to recognise and to have benefited from i-gave, making i-gave the common platform for donation across the varsity.

  4. bizzkit0102

     says:

    February 23rd, 2009 at 11.17pm

    Personally, I feel I already gave >$20000 for my education in NTU. Why should I give anymore? There’s no such thing as a free lunch. And there isn’t a free breakfast or dinner as well.

Leave a Reply

Leave a comment or send us a letter?

Commenting is instantaneous and can be anonymous if you choose not to reveal your real name. A letter, however, cannot be anonymous and takes a day or two to be edited and published. The upside to a signed letter is that it is more prominent and credible compared with an anonymous comment tagged to the end of an article.

Powered by WP Hashcash